|
Q：
|
How is the "malicious registration not for the purpose of use" explicitly defined in the new Trademark Law specifically determined?
|
|
A：
|
The new Trademark Law clearly takes "obviously exceeding the normal business operation demands" as the core judgment standard, and the normal defensive trademark layout of enterprises will not be mistakenly rejected.
|
|
Q：
|
What special materials need to be submitted for dynamic trademark application under the new Trademark Law?
|
|
A：
|
In addition to the conventional registration materials, a clear dynamic effect display document that meets the format requirements specified by the China National Intellectual Property Administration shall be submitted.
|
|
Q：
|
What acts of "using a trademark through the Internet" are recognized under the new Trademark Law?
|
|
A：
|
Acts such as displaying trademarks on e-commerce product detail pages, brand exposure in live streaming rooms, and using trademarks on social media accounts all belong to the trademark use behaviors recognized by the new law.
|
|
Q：
|
Will the idle trademarks hoarded by enterprises before be directly punished after the implementation of the new Trademark Law?
|
|
A：
|
The new law does not have retroactive effect. The new penalty rules will only apply to new hoarding-related applications submitted after the new law is officially implemented.
|
|
Q：
|
Does the cross-class protection for unregistered well-known trademarks under the new Trademark Law cover all commodity classes?
|
|
A：
|
It does not cover all classes, and can only cover relevant associated classes that are likely to mislead the public and damage the interests of the well-known trademark.
|
日本語
よくあるご質問
